Extreme Temperature Diary- Monday March 1st, 2020/ Main Topic: Why Global Emission Goals Aren’t Nearly Sufficient For Climate Crisis Mitigation

Dear Diary. The main purpose of this ongoing blog will be to track global extreme or record temperatures related to climate change. Any reports I see of ETs will be listed below the main topic of the day. I’ll refer to extreme or record temperatures as ETs (not extraterrestrials).😉

Main Topic: Why Global Emission Goals Aren’t Nearly Sufficient For Climate Crisis Mitigation

Dear Diary. Welcome to boreal spring or meteorological spring. Most icy, cold winter weather is behind us for this year across the Northern Hemisphere.

Most of us have goals used to attain an end result. Let’s say for our discussion today that you want to buy an item for Christmas without credit by saving X number of dollars the next ten months. In order to meet your goal X would need to be sufficient enough if you budget wisely to add up to the price tag of your gift, otherwise you will be disappointed not to be able to get that gift for your loved one…unless you used credit. Well, in the emissions game to protect our climate you can’t use credit. There is a set carbon budget that must be adhered to so that climate goals will be met…otherwise all Christmases soon will be quite miserable, full of all sorts of weather and sea rise misery.

Apparently nations around the globe aren’t taking the climate crisis seriously. Goals are nowhere near high enough to attain that Christmas goodie of a bright green sustainable future for all. Here is more from the New York Times indicating how short most nations truly are to keep our climate safe:


Global Action Is ‘Very Far’ From What’s Needed to Avert Climate Chaos

New climate pledges submitted to the United Nations would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by less than 1 percent, the world body announced.

A natural gas refinery in Mexico, which recently weakened its climate targets.Credit…Henry Romero/Reuters

Somini Sengupta

By Somini Sengupta

  • Feb. 26, 2021

The global scientific consensus is clear: Emissions of planet-warming gases must be cut by nearly half by 2030 if the world is to have a good shot at averting the worst climate catastrophes.

The global political response has been underwhelming so far.

New climate targets submitted by countries to the United Nations would reduce emissions by less than 1 percent, according to the latest tally, made public Friday by the world body.

The head of the United Nations climate agency, Patricia Espinosa, said the figures compiled by her office showed that “current levels of climate ambition are very far from putting us on a pathway that will meet our Paris Agreement goals.”

The figures offer a reality check on the many promises coming from world capitals and company boardrooms that leaders are taking climate change seriously.

  • Help our journalists make an impact.

Support The Times. Subscribe.

The United Nations secretary general, António Guterres, called the report “a red alert.”

The tally was all the more damning because fewer than half of all countries submitted fresh targets to the United Nations. The Paris climate accord, designed to limit an increase in global temperatures, had urged them to do so by the end of 2020.

Still missing from the ledger is the United States, which has produced more greenhouse gas emissions than any other country in history. It rejoined the Paris Agreement last week, after the former president, Donald J. Trump, pulled out. It has yet to submit its 2030 targets and is under pressure from climate advocates to reduce emissions by at least 50 percent compared with 2005 levels.

Likewise, China, which currently produces the largest share of emissions, has yet to submit new 2030 targets to the United Nations. Its president, Xi Jinping, said in December that China would produce more of its electricity from renewable sources (25 percent), grow more forests (six billion cubic meters) and reduce its carbon intensity by over 65 percent, which means that as China’s economy grows, its carbon emissions would grow at a slower pace than before.

Mr. Xi has said China will be carbon neutral by 2060, meaning it will remove from the atmosphere planet-warming carbon emissions equal to the amount it still produces at that time.

The Biden administration has said it aspires to net-zero emissions by 2050 but has yet to detail how it will get there.

All eyes are on an international climate summit that the White House is set to host on April 22. The United States is expected to announce its 2030 climate targets by then, and China may well come forward with an announcement of its own, too.

The diplomacy culminates with the next round of United Nations climate talks, scheduled to be held in Glasgow in November.

Some of the biggest emitter countries — including Australia, Brazil and Russia — submitted new plans for 2030 without increasing their ambitions. Mexico lowered its climate targets, which the Natural Resources Defense Council described as a signal that “Mexico is effectively retreating from its previous leadership on climate and clean energy.”

In contrast, 36 countries — among them Britain, Chile, Kenya, Nepal and the 27 countries of the European Union — raised their climate targets.

The Paris Agreement is designed in such a way that the United Nations can neither dictate nor enforce any country’s climate targets, or what are called nationally determined contributions. Each country is expected to set its own, make regular reports to the world on its progress and set new targets every five years. Diplomatic peer pressure is meant to persuade each country to be more ambitious.

The end goal is to limit global temperature increase to within 1.5 degrees Celsius of 1990 levels. Any warming beyond that, scientists have said in exhaustive studies, would risk widening wildfires and droughts, growing food and water insecurity, and the inundation of coastal cities and small islands.

The Alliance of Small Island States, a group of countries that are among those most threatened by climate change, issued a searing response to the report on Friday.

“This report confirms the shocking lack of urgency, and genuine action,” Aubrey Webson, a diplomat from Antigua and Barbuda and the chairman of the alliance, said in a statement. “We are flirting dangerously with the 1.5 Celsius warming limit that the world agreed we need to stay within.”

Somini Sengupta is an international climate correspondent. She has also covered the Middle East, West Africa and South Asia for The Times and received the 2003 George Polk Award for her work in Congo, Liberia and other conflict zones. @SominiSengupta • Facebook

Very much related:


Here is some February 2021 climatology:

Here is more climate and weather news from Monday:

(As usual, this will be a fluid post in which more information gets added during the day as it crosses my radar, crediting all who have put it on-line. Items will be archived on this site for posterity. In most instances click on the pictures of each tweet to see each article. The most noteworthy items will be listed first.)

Now here are some of today’s articles and notes on the horrid COVID-19 pandemic:

(If you like these posts and my work please contribute via the PayPal widget, which has recently been added to this site. Thanks in advance for any support.) 

Guy Walton “The Climate Guy”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *