Extreme Temperature Diary- Thursday May 1st, 2025/Main Topic: Rolling Back Gas Guzzling Car Mandates

Important analysis showing that resistance to system-level policies is stronger BEFORE implementation. And this holds across various contexts including 🚗 car bans, 💉 vaccination mandates, 🚫 speed limits, 🚬 smoking bans and more. (likely climate too!)

Katharine Hayhoe (@katharinehayhoe.com) 2025-05-01T16:14:21.624Z

Here is more from the Washington Post:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/05/01/california-cars-waiver-house-vote

House votes to block California from banning sales of gas cars by 2035

Both the Senate parliamentarian and the Government Accountability Office have concluded that Congress lacks authority to block California’s climate policy.

By Maxine Joselow

The House voted Thursday to block California from enforcing a rule that would ban sales of new gasoline-powered cars in the state by 2035.

Lawmakers voted 246-164 to pass a resolution targeting the rule, which ranks as one of the nation’s most ambitious policies aimed at combating climate change and promoting electric vehicles. However, it is unclear whether the Senate will follow suit and send the measure to President Donald Trump’s desk.

In forging ahead with the vote, House Republicans sidestepped legal opinions from two nonpartisan watchdogs. The Senate parliamentarian and the Government Accountability Office have concluded that Congress lacks the legal authority to prevent states from enforcing such climate rules.

Under the Clean Air Act, California can receive a waiver from the Environmental Protection Agency to set tougher vehicle emissions standards than those of the federal government. California regulators approved a rule in 2022 that would phase out sales of new gas-powered cars by 2035, and in December under President Joe Biden, the EPA granted the state a waiver to enforce the regulation.

Eleven other states have pledged to adopt California’s rule and end sales of gas cars within their own borders by 2035. Together, the states account for about 40 percent of the U.S. auto market.

Environmental and public health advocates have applauded these state actions, saying they will cause a significant drop in planet-warming emissions and harmful air pollution. But Republicans and business groups have slammed these moves, saying they will prevent consumers from choosing what kind of cars to drive.

Rep. John Joyce (R-Pennsylvania) introduced a resolution to revoke California’s waiver under the Congressional Review Act, which allows lawmakers to nullify a regulation within 60 days of its enactment with a simple majority vote.

“Congress, not California, is the only body that can regulate the interstate automotive market,” Joyce said during a Monday meeting of the House Rules Committee, which considered the resolution before sending it to the House floor. “What works in Hollywood doesn’t work in Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania.”

Yet the Senate parliamentarian, the nonpartisan arbiter of the upper chamber’s rules and procedures, ruled this month that the waiver is not a regulation subject to the Congressional Review Act. The Government Accountability Office issued a similar legal opinion in March.

When asked about these legal findings on Monday, Joyce said, “Let me get back to you because I am not clued in on that.” He declined to comment further as aides whisked him away to another engagement after the Rules Committee meeting.

Rep. Paul Tonko (D-New York) warned that passage of the resolution could set a dangerous precedent.

“It would represent an extraordinary, illegal expansion of the use of the Congressional Review Act, which ultimately could threaten far more than just California’s vehicle standards,” Tonko told the Rules Committee. “Other executive actions like approval of state waivers for Medicaid programs and energy infrastructure permits could be blocked in the future.”

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-West Virginia), who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, sponsored the resolution targeting the waiver in the upper chamber. She declined to say Tuesday whether she would push for a vote on the measure despite the parliamentarian’s ruling.

“We’re exploring all options,” Capito told reporters. “That was submitted as a rule by the administration; that should be covered under the Congressional Review Act. So we have a disagreement here, but we’re looking at what our options could be.”

In the House, 35 Democrats joined Republicans in voting for the resolution targeting the waiver. One Republican, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, voted against the measure.

Groups representing automakers and oil refiners had lobbied lawmakers to rescind the waiver. The Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents all the major U.S. vehicle manufacturers, argued in a Monday letter to lawmakers that California’s rule is “unachievable” and “will result in a major loss of auto industry jobs.”

But climate activists and electric vehicle advocates warned that the waiver revocation would prevent state officials from protecting the health of their residents.

“Congress is not better suited than state governments to decide whether to adopt clean air standards for communities in those states,” said Albert Gore, executive director of the Zero Emission Transportation Association, an industry group that promotes EVs.

Under Biden, the EPA granted California a total of three waivers to enforce its own vehicle emissions rules. The House voted Wednesday to rescind the other two waivers, which would allow the state to slash emissions from heavy-duty trucks.

Regardless of action on Capitol Hill, the EPA could revoke California’s waivers on its own. But that process could take months, whereas lawmakers can act immediately under the Congressional Review Act.

The EPA did not respond to a request for comment.

By Maxine Joselow Maxine Joselow is a staff writer who covers climate change and the environment, with a focus on U.S. climate policy and politics. Send her secure tips on Signal at MaxineJ.55 follow on X@maxinejoselow

The Trump administration this week summarily dismissed more than 400 scientists and other experts who had begun to write the latest National Climate Asst. As I say here, climate change puts us all at risk, and we all need this vital information. Without it, the future will be much more dangerous.

Katharine Hayhoe (@katharinehayhoe.com) 2025-04-30T21:57:41.099Z

A new @wwattribution.bsky.social study found that climate change made the hot, dry, and windy conditions that drove last month's wildfires in South Korea about twice as likely and 15% more intense.@climameter.bsky.social eos.org/articles/cli…

Eos (@eos.org) 2025-04-30T20:34:25.900Z

The first paper from my PhD is now out in @aslo.org Limnology and Oceanography Letters! We used nine years of daily temp and chl data from Peter, Paul, and Tuesday Lakes to show that aquatic heatwaves increased surface chlorophyll concentrations during 24 out of 29 events.doi.org/10.1002/lol2…

Danny Szydlowski (@dannyszydlowski.bsky.social) 2025-05-01T15:37:49.595Z

Introducing the special inaugural double issue of Dialogues on Climate Change @dialoguescc.bsky.social, with 27 authors addressing the state of research in 20 articles on hotly debated topics!Volume 1 Issue 1: journals.sagepub.com/toc/dcca/1/1Volume 2 Issue 1: journals.sagepub.com/toc/dcca/2/1

Rob Bellamy (@drrobbellamy.bsky.social) 2025-04-29T07:39:26.900Z

Ten Vital Services Provided by NOAA (Beyond the National Weather Service) – essential reading from @whysharksmatter.bsky.social @ucsusa.bsky.social blog.ucs.org/science-blog…

John R. Platt (@johnrplatt.bsky.social) 2025-04-30T22:12:18.681Z

Germany to Get 99% of Its Power From Solar and Wind on Thursdaywww.bloomberg.com/news/article…

Nick Hedley (@nickhedley.bsky.social) 2025-05-01T10:18:19.750Z

Last year, Pakistan installed an incredible 22GW of solar—more than Canada has ever built!Pakistan initially committed to slash emissions 20% by 2030. But in 2021, it upped that commitment to 50%, as it's a win-win: switching to clean energy addresses poverty too.Read more:

Katharine Hayhoe (@katharinehayhoe.com) 2025-05-01T01:28:52.616Z

Researchers have developed a process for refining nickel that they say could dramatically cut its carbon footprint, which is currently equivalent to the total emissions of a small country.https://go.nature.com/4iLfKCu

Nature (@nature.com) 2025-04-30T20:42:40.655Z

.Open Access Science paper helping kids to understand Climate Change: Frontiers for young mindsWhat Do Different Levels of Climate Change Mean For Our Future? Read on: www.frontiersin.org/article…#ClimateAction

My Zero Carbon #ClimateAction (@myzerocarbon.org) 2025-04-30T22:00:08.996Z

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *