Extreme Temperature Diary- Sunday December 15th, 2019/ Main Topic: Did The Madrid COP 25 Fail? (A Discussion)

Sunday December 15th… Dear Diary. The main purpose of this ongoing blog will be to track United States extreme or record temperatures related to climate change. Any reports I see of ETs will be listed below the main topic of the day. I’ll refer to extreme or record temperatures as ETs (not extraterrestrials).😉

Did The Madrid COP25 Fail? (A Discussion)

Dear Diary. In life there are different degrees of success or failure in association with any endeavor, so to start out today’s main topic for discussion I’d like to point out that we can now judge some results from Madrid COP25 (or the 2019 United Nations Climate Conference held in Madrid Spain). The two week conference got underway on December 2nd and just ended. In the future critical success with mitigating climate change will be measured literally in terms of tenths of degree Celsius, with lower numbers getting ranked as A’s on our worldwide test and higher numbers F’s or failure. At what level and when will global temperature averages peak? Scientists are still trying to determine if keeping global averages below 1.5°C will be an A for the climate, or would great success be declared at +2.0°C at or above preindustrial conditions. Certainly anything higher would get C and D’s, if not get an F grade. After COP25 leaders on this planet are getting that F grade as judged by many.

This post is not hard to write, but is tough to type since perhaps it is the worst climate news of 2019, worse than anything that I have reported so far this year. Time after time since Kyoto during the 1990s climate agreements and conferences have come up short, not giving climate scientists and activists much hope for the future, but we keep trying. As of 2019 since the Paris Accords were ratified the world is taking baby steps towards climate mitigation. The preverbial baby was crawling as a result of COP25. We only have about eight more years to learn how to run and sprint.

Greta Thunberg and her many youthful followers striking for the climate are not pleased with the lukewarm results from COP25. Big oil and gas had their mighty tentacles in the conference, which I’m sure made many ratified proposals lack the teeth needed to take a big bite out of climate change.

Today I am using an Associated Press piece to aid in judging what happened at COP25:


Disappointment as marathon climate talks end with slim deal


MADRID (AP) — Marathon U.N. climate talks ended Sunday with a slim compromise that sparked widespread disappointment, after major polluters resisted calls for ramping up efforts to keep global warming at bay and negotiators postponed debate about rules for international carbon markets for another year.

Organizers kept delegates from almost 200 nations in Madrid far beyond Friday’s scheduled close of the two-week talks. In the end, negotiators endorsed a general call for greater efforts to tackle climate change and several measures to help poor countries respond and adapt to its impacts

U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said he was “disappointed” by the meeting’s outcome.

“The international community lost an important opportunity to show increased ambition on mitigation, adaptation and finance to tackle the climate crisis,” he said. “We must not give up and I will not give up.”

The final declaration cited an “urgent need” to cut planet-heating greenhouse gases in line with the goals of the landmark 2015 Paris climate change accord. But it fell far short of explicitly demanding that countries submit bolder emissions proposals next year, which developing countries and environmentalists had demanded.

The Paris accord established a common goal of keeping temperature increases below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit), ideally 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of the century. So far, the world is on course for a 3- to 4-degree Celsius rise, with potentially dramatic consequences for many countries, including rising sea levels and fiercer storms.

After two nights of fractious negotiations, delegates in Madrid decided to defer some of the thorniest issues to the next U.N. climate summit in Glasgow in November.

Chile’s Environment Minister Carolina Schmidt, who chaired the meeting, said she was “sad” no deal had been reached on the rules for international trading in carbon emissions permits.

“We were on the verge,” she said, adding that the goal was to establish markets that are “robust and environmentally sustainable.”

Economists say putting a price on carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, and allowing countries or companies to trade emissions permits, will encourage the shift to away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy.

Some observers welcomed the failure of a deal on carbon markets, though, and the European Union and developing countries had said beforehand that no deal was better than a bad one.

“Thankfully, the weak rules on a market-based mechanism, promoted by Brazil and Australia, that would have undermined efforts to reduce emissions, have been shelved,” said Mohamed Adow, director of Nairobi-based campaign group Power Shift Africa.

Helen Mountford, from the environmental think-tank World Resources Institute, said that “given the high risks of loopholes discussed in Madrid, it was better to delay than accept rules that would have compromised the integrity of the Paris Agreement.”

The talks in Spain took place against a backdrop of growing worldwide concern about climate change. The past year saw large protests in hundreds of cities around the globe and climate activists staged several rallies inside and outside the conference venue to express their frustration at the slow pace of the talks.

The meeting was moved from Chile’s capital Santiago to Madrid at a month’s due to violent protests against the Chilean government, which was under pressure to deliver a positive result.

Delegates made some progress on financial aid for poor countries affected by climate change, despite strong resistance from the United States to any clause holding big polluters liable for the damage caused by their emissions. Countries agreed four years ago to funnel $100 billion per year by 2020 to assist developing nations, but so far nowhere near that amount has been raised.

Under the Paris accord, countries are supposed to regularly review their national emissions reduction targets and increase them if necessary. Last week, the European Union agreed a goal of becoming carbon neutral by mid-century, but the move did little to sway discussions in Madrid about setting more ambitious targets in the medium term, an issue that will be on the agenda again in Glasgow.

The United States will be excluded from much of those talks after President Donald Trump announced the country’s withdrawal from the Paris accord, a process than comes into force Nov. 4, 2020.

Scientists said the longer countries wait to cut emissions, the harder it will be to meet the Paris temperature target.

“The global emissions’ curve needs to bend in 2020,” said Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research near Berlin.

“Emissions need to be cut half by 2030, and net zero emissions need to be a reality by 2050,” he said. “Achieving this is possible — with existing technologies and within our current economy. The window of opportunity is open, but barely.”


Follow AP’s climate coverage at https://www.apnews.com/Climate

Here are more linked articles:

Well, at least weak rules that compromised the integrity of the Paris Accords and maybe even in the future spike emissions were not adopted, and at least nations are still negotiating, so COP25 was not a total failure. Nevertheless, the mainline press has keyed in on the fact that what came out of COP25 kicked the proverbial can down the road…and that road is getting shorter with each passing month and year.

Here is some of what I am seeing on social media concerning COP25. Pay particular attention to what Greta Thunberg has stated:

Just go to Twitter #COP25 for much more. Well, enough said and written about COP25 for now. The old Climate Guy will be deeply disappointed…and peeved…if I write similar statements for COP26 in 2020.

Here is more climate and weather news from Sunday:

(As usual, this will be a fluid post in which more information gets added during the day as it crosses my radar, crediting all who have put it on-line. Items will be archived on this site for posterity. In most instances click on the pictures of each tweet to see each article.)

Here is an “ET” from Canada:

(If you like these posts and my work please contribute via the PayPal widget, which has recently been added to this site. Thanks in advance for any support.) 

Guy Walton- “The Climate Guy”

One thought on “Extreme Temperature Diary- Sunday December 15th, 2019/ Main Topic: Did The Madrid COP 25 Fail? (A Discussion)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *