Extreme Temperature Diary- Wednesday January 31st, 2024/ Main Topic: An Update…What Must Be Done to Turn Back The “CCC” or “Climate Crisis Clock”

Extreme Temperature Diary- Sunday January 26th, 2020/ Main Topic: Counting Down To Doomsday…What Must Be Done To Turn Back The “CCC” or “Climate Crisis Clock” – Guy On Climate

Doomsday Clock resets to 90 seconds to midnight bulletin (nwitimes.com)

Davich: As Doomsday Clock resets to 90 seconds to midnight, what are you doing to pull it back?

  • Jerry Davich 219-853-2563
  • 1/31/2024

The infamous “Doomsday Clock” has been reset to 90 seconds to midnight, the closest our world has ever been to apocalypse, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

The symbolic Clock was created in 1947 by a group of scientists, including Albert Einstein, J. Robert Oppenheimer and University of Chicago scientists, who worked on the Manhattan Project. It was designed to demonstrate how close we, as humans, are to self-destruction through nuclear war or man-made technologies. And the contemporary idiom of nuclear explosion (countdown to zero) to convey threats to humanity and the planet.

When I first wrote about the Clock – on the last day of January in 2000 – Stephen Schwartz, the former publisher of the Bulletin, told me the metaphorical concept of a clock helps people better understand an unfathomable concept – the end of the world as we know it.

“Otherwise, this concept is too abstract and too horrific to understand enough to act on it,” he said.

The Clock wasn’t always so close to midnight in recent memory. In 2007, it was at seven minutes to midnight, where it stood for the five previous years. Today, it’s teetering just 90 seconds away from … something.

“Ominous trends continue to point the world toward global catastrophe,” the Bulletin states.

Is this merely Chicken Little hyperbole or is it an inevitable reality for our species?

A variety of global threats cast menacing shadows in our world while hanging over us like sharpened guillotines. For example: the Russia-Ukraine war and deterioration of nuclear arms reduction agreements; the Climate Crisis and 2023’s official designation as the hottest year on record; the increased sophistication of genetic engineering technologies; and the dramatic advance of generative artificial intelligence which could magnify disinformation and corrupt the global information environment making it harder to solve the larger existential challenges, the organization insists.

“Make no mistake. Resetting the Clock at 90 seconds to midnight is not an indication that the world is stable. Quite the opposite,” said Rachel Bronson, president and CEO of the Bulletin. “It’s urgent for governments and communities around the world to act. And the Bulletin remains hopeful— and inspired – in seeing the younger generations leading the charge.”

A familiar face from an older generation – Bill Nye “the science guy” – attended the Bulletin’s public announcement, saying, “For decades, scientists have been warning us of the dangers facing humankind. We could be facing catastrophe unless we better manage the technologies we’ve created. It’s time to act.”

The skeptic in me says this is merely decades-old hogwash, dragged out of the Cold War closet by a group of overly concerned scientists. Is anybody with any power really listening? I doubt it.

The idealist in me says such stunts may actually prompt global action from lazy and apathetic citizens. Every action matters. Every effort counts. Everyone is in the same sinking Titanic.

The realist in me knows darn well that certain nuclear-obsessed leaders in Iran, Russia and North Korea, for example, couldn’t care less about the time of day on some silly Doomsday Clock.

And yet, we quietly wonder if nuclear warfare is a possibility versus an inevitability.

“If an expert offers you a probabilistic assessment of the likelihood of nuclear war breaking out, you should be very skeptical,” states an insightful analysis from The Brookings Institution.

The Washington, D.C.-based think tank and its scholars are known as a trusted resource for rigorous research and innovative ideas across fields such as foreign policy.

“We are likely to overestimate the likelihood of nuclear war when those estimates are informed by public behavior, because we can’t see the private behavior that would decrease our estimates,” the analysis states.

“Make no mistake. Resetting the Clock at 90 seconds to midnight is not an indication that the world is stable. Quite the opposite,” said Rachel Bronson, president and CEO of the Bulletin. “It’s urgent for governments and communities around the world to act. And the Bulletin remains hopeful— and inspired – in seeing the younger generations leading the charge.”Provided

Private behavior is what I’m more interested in because I have little hope in public behavior. I have even less hope in our global leaders, many who lust for power more than they love mankind. They are ruthless scorpions in a proverbial sea of clueless frogs.

“Only the big powers like China, America and Russia can pull us back. Despite deep antagonisms, they must cooperate – or we are doomed,” said Jerry Brown, executive chair of the Bulletin.

Critics of the Doomsday Clock insist that our planet has been getting along just fine for more than 4 billion years and we will figure out ways to not only survive but to persevere. The Bulletin’s board of directors, including nine Nobel laureates, agrees but only if we change our self-destructive habits.

“The world can be made safer. The Clock can move away from midnight,” the Bulletin states.

In 1945, just after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Bulletin’s founding scientists felt a profound sense of responsibility for the potential consequences of their own work. All of us should feel a similar sense of responsibility for the consequences of our actions, or our inaction.

Tick-tock, everyone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *