Extreme Temperature Diary- Saturday July 12th, 2025/Main Topic: Damning Report Shows Every Major US LNG Project Fails Climate Test

https://www.commondreams.org/news/a-call-to-conscience-damning-report-shows-every-major-us-lng-project-fails-climate-test

‘A Call to Conscience’: Damning Report Shows Every Major US LNG Project Fails Climate Test

“What we found was crystal clear—any further investment in LNG is not compatible with a livable climate.”

Brett Wilkins

As U.S. President Donald Trump ramps up fossil fuel production under his “drill, baby, drill” energy policy, a report published Wednesday highlights the climate and financial harms posed by new liquefied natural gas export projects—all of which fail a “climate test” that the Department of Energy issued during the Biden administration.

The report—published by Greenpeace USA, Earthworks, and Oil Change International—examines five major U.S. LNG projects: Venture Global CP2, Cameron LNG Phase II, Sabine Pass Stage V, Cheniere Corpus Christi LNG Midscale 8-9, and Freeport LNG Expansion.

Instead of giving into Trump’s pressure to import + finance more LNG, leaders must invest in a just transition to renewable energy that will protect our communities from deadly pollution and climate disasters. Learn more: www.greenpeace.org/usa/failing-…

Oil Change International (@oilchange.bsky.social) 2025-07-09T13:57:35.622Z

All but one of the projects is awaiting a final investment decision. None passes a “climate test” derived from the Department of Energy’s (DOE) December 2024 LNG export public interest studies, as they all would result in a net increase in global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions regardless of sustainability measures including supply basin switching, LNG terminal methane abatement, and powering liquefaction with renewable electricity.

“Increasing LNG exports from the Gulf Coast would still lead to global GHG emissions increases above the level consistent with the DOE’s most stringent climate mitigation scenario,” the report states. Data suggests “no realistic mitigation can make U.S. LNG exports aligned with limiting warming to 1.5ºC,” the more ambitious goal of the Paris climate agreement. Trump has twice withdrawn the United States from the landmark accord.

“What we found was crystal clear—any further investment in LNG is not compatible with a livable climate,” Greenpeace USA senior research specialist Andres Chang, the report’s lead author, said in a statement.

“The massive growth in infrastructure along the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast has already created significant public health and ecosystem impacts, threatening entire coastal communities,” Chang added. “But it doesn’t stop there. This report shows that if built, these projects would put global climate goals even further out of reach.”

“No realistic mitigation can make U.S. LNG exports aligned with limiting warming to 1.5ºC.”

The United States is the world’s leading natural gas producer and LNG exporter. While the fossil fuel industry often calls LNG a “bridge fuel”—a cleaner alternative to coal that will ease the transition to sustainable energy sources—critics have warned that the fossil gas actually hampers the transition to a green economy. LNG is mostly composed of methane, which has more than 80 times the planetary heating power of carbon dioxide during its first two decades in the atmosphere.

Despite his own DOE’s acknowledgment that approving more LNG exports would raise domestic energy prices, increase pollution, and exacerbate the climate crisis, former President Joe Biden oversaw what climate campaigners called a “staggering” LNG expansion, including Venture Global’s Calcasieu Pass 2 export terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana and more than a dozen other projects.

Trump—who during his 2024 campaign vowed to “frack, frack, frack; and drill, baby, drill” as fossil fuel interests poured $75 million into his campaign coffers—is planning to increase LNG exports even more, in part by invoking his bogus “energy emergency” to fast-track polluting projects.

A report published in January by Friends of the Earth and Public Citizen examined 14 proposed LNG export terminals that the Trump administration sought to fast-track and found they would create 510 million metric tons of climate pollution—equivalent to the annual emissions of 135 new coal plants.

Oil Change International noted Wednesday that “future administrations could revoke export authorizations that were rubber-stamped under Trump based on their failure to pass the DOE ‘climate test,’ which introduces a new layer of uncertainty to these already-risky projects.”

The report also underscores that while the DOE climate test “is a major improvement upon previous federal analyses,” its methodology “still fails to sufficiently account for emissions from large, accidental releases (such as ‘super-emitter’ events), equipment malfunction, and malpractice.”

“High rates of methane emissions during the ocean transport stage of the LNG supply chain are also not represented,” the report adds. “Incorporating measurement-based data and more realistic assumptions would make clearer the immense climate impact of building new liquefied gas infrastructure, especially in the near-term.”

The report’s authors call on the DOE to invoke the “climate test” to reject pending and future LNG export applications and exercise its authority under the Natural Gas Act “to reevaluate the public interest status of LNG projects that received authorizations without consideration of climate impacts or under analyses that predate the 2024 LNG Study.”

The publication also calls on Congress to pass legislation “that makes it a statutory requirement under the Natural Gas Act to assess the climate impact of gas exports and reject applications that would increase global GHG emissions under a credible scenario to limit warming to 1.5ºC.”

“Additionally, U.S. federal agencies should require all new proposed fossil fuel production and infrastructure projects to meet a similarly high standard under the National Environmental Policy Act,” the report asserts.

“Energy purchasers, financial institutions, and foreign governments should refrain from entering into long-term offtake agreements for U.S. LNG and financing of LNG infrastructure,” the authors wrote. “Instead, these parties should prioritize measures that accelerate the renewable energy transition and plan for a managed phase-out of fossil fuels. Group of Seven nations, in particular, should abide by their 2022 commitment to stop financing overseas fossil fuel infrastructure with taxpayer money.”

James Hiatt, founder and director of the Lake Charles, Louisiana-based advocacy group For a Better Bayou, said Wednesday that “fossil fuel dependency has long externalized its true costs, forcing communities to bear the burden of pollution, sickness, and economic instability.”

“For decades the oil and gas industry has known about the devastating health and climate impacts of its operations, yet it continues to expand, backed by billions in private and public financing,” Hiatt continued. “These harms are not isolated—they’re systemic, and they threaten all of us.”

“This report is a call to conscience,” he added. “It’s time we stop propping up deadly false solutions and start investing in a transition to energy systems that sustain life, not sacrifice it.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Brett Wilkins

Full Bio >

A resonance phenomenon is causing big waves in the atmosphere. And that has increased due to #globalwarming, causing wild summer extremes, a new data analysis finds.The mechanism was first identified in 2013 by the late Vladimir Petoukhov at the Potsdam Institute.apnews.com/article/extr…

Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf (@rahmstorf.bsky.social) 2025-06-17T10:31:11.672Z

This also seems relevant. Guess how many of those companies are based in Canada versus the US.

Katharine Hayhoe (@katharinehayhoe.com) 2025-07-12T04:55:31.577Z

Regardless of where we live or how we vote, extreme weather puts us all at risk: and we know, without a shadow of a doubt, climate change is making it worse.To build resilience, we need more data, more expertise, more preparation, more communication to keep people safe—NOT LESS!More from me:

Katharine Hayhoe (@katharinehayhoe.com) 2025-07-11T20:34:38.761Z
https://twitter.com/CarbonBrief/status/1943899685237723245

We see here a self-styled "honest broker" with decades of experience in downplaying climate change presenting an age-old climate denial trope: using *annual* rainfall data as argument against an increase in *extreme* rainfall. Does he *really* not know better? Or assume his readers won't? 🧵1/5

Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf (@rahmstorf.bsky.social) 2025-07-12T14:59:49.485Z

Remember when Trump was using a Sharpie to modify hurricane path projections when the NOAA and NWS were still functional? Now we have the same level of stupidity and incompetence without the benefit of functional government organizations. What could go wrong? 🙄🙄🙄

#VeryAsian Eric (@ektaka.bsky.social) 2025-07-12T18:31:43.577Z

American politicians telling MB to manage its forests better so they don’t get the wildfire smoke is like someone with a backyard pond telling us to manage the pollution in the Great Lakes better. When, to expand the analogy, 🇺🇸 are responsible for 30% of the problem and 🇨🇦 are responsible for 2%.

Katharine Hayhoe (@katharinehayhoe.com) 2025-07-12T04:54:19.161Z

Now is the time that I remind you that, while plague has been endemic in the western United States for 70+ years and this is a normal occurrence, our work does seem to strongly suggest climate change is increasing spillover risk onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10….

Colin J. Carlson (@colincarlson.bsky.social) 2025-07-11T19:06:22.199Z

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *