Extreme Temperature Diary-Wednesday July 16th, 2025/Main Topic: Trump Stops the Development of a NOAA Tool to Help Communities Prepare for Future Floods

One of the most important advances in #climate science is the ability now to "fingerprint" extreme events (floods/heat waves/drought) and identify the role climate change plays.This advance is also causing conniptions among climate deniers now shown evidence of the real-world impacts of denial.

Peter Gleick (@petergleick.bsky.social) 2025-07-13T23:33:27.138Z

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/07/16/noaa-rainfall-predictions-climate-change

NOAA was developing a tool to help communities prepare for future rainfall. Trump officials stopped it.

By Sarah Kaplan

The Commerce Department has indefinitely suspended work on a tool to help communities predict how rising global temperatures will alter the frequency of extreme rainfall, according to three current and former federal officials familiar with the decision, a move that experts said will make the country more vulnerable to storms supercharged by climate change.

The tool is part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Atlas 15 project — a massive dataset that will show how often storms of a given duration and intensity could be expected to occur at locations across the United States. The project was intended to be published in two volumes: one that would assess communities’ current risks and a second that would project how those risks will change under future climate scenarios.

The release of Atlas 15 had been long awaited by civil engineers, regional planners and other groups that use NOAA’s precipitation frequency estimates to develop regulations and design infrastructure. Many parts of the country rely on decades-old data to determine their rainfall risks, and there is no authoritative national dataset of how rainfall and flood threats will rise in a warmer world.

But work on Atlas 15’s climate projections has been on hold for months after Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick ordered a review of Volume 2 this spring, according to current and former NOAA officials with knowledge of the project.

National Weather Service spokeswoman Erica Grow Cei confirmed the move to delay the forward-looking component of Atlas 15, saying Lutnick’s review is aimed at “making sure research dollars and technology investments are being put to the very best use for the American people.” She declined to say how long the hold is expected to last.

Ed Clark, who had worked extensively on Atlas 15 as director of the agency’sNational Water Center, said that research for Volume 2 was almost complete before he retired in late April and that the remaining work did not have “a large price tag.”

Meanwhile, the toll of intensifying storms is becoming increasingly apparent. In the first 15 days of July, the National Weather Service has reported twice the usual number of flash floods — including the deluge that killed at least 130 people in Central Texas and heavy rains in the northeast that drowned two people in New Jersey and left New York subway stations submerged.

The review of Atlas 15 is among a number of efforts by the Trump administration to curb climate science. The administration dismissed the scientists responsible for writing the National Climate Assessment — a congressionally mandated study typically published every four to five years — and dismantled the program that oversees the reports. In a budget document submitted to Congress last month, Trump proposed zeroing out funding for NOAA’s climate research and eliminating many of the agency’s laboratories and institutes.

Clark worries that delaying the release of Atlas 15 climate projections — or canceling the volume altogether — could leave communities unprepared for shifting flood risks and make it harder for engineers to ensure that buildings, bridges and other projects can cope with future rainfall extremes.

“Designing our infrastructure for resilience is fundamentally a cost-saving measure,” he said.

Preliminary data for Volume 1, which is based on historical observations, is still on track to be made public by the end of this year, according to Fernando Salas, director of the geo-intelligence division at the National Water Center. For every location in the contiguous United States, the dataset will show the likelihood of a given amount of precipitation falling in a certain period — helping communities determine the level of rainfall they should expect to occur every year, as well as the sort of storm that would be expected to happen once every century.

“It’s going to ensure we’ve got that baseline established for the entire country,” Salas said.

But the speed with which rising global temperatures are altering precipitation patterns means that the Volume 1 estimates “will be out of date very quickly,” said Jeremy Porter, head of climate implications research at the nonprofit First Street Foundation.

It is a fact of physics that rising global temperatures allow the atmosphere to hold more moisture, providing additional fuel for extreme storms. In a peer-reviewed analysis published in 2023, First Street scientists found that 20 percent of the U.S. has already seen a fourfold increase in the likelihood of 100-year rainfall (an event with a 1 percent chance of happening in any given year). Once-rare events are expected to become even more common as the world continues to warm.

A pilot version of Atlas 15 that includes current and future precipitation frequency estimates for Montana was released last year. Though the state is not expected to be among those hit hardest by extreme rainfall in a warming climate, the Volume 2 estimates showed that rainfall rates for 1-in-100-year events could increase by more than a tenth of an inch per hour if the world stays on its current warming path.

The Northeast, Appalachia and other flood-prone regions are expected to experience even bigger increases in the intensity and frequency of extreme events, Porter said. But if NOAA doesn’t restart work on Volume 2, those states won’t know exactly what those changes will be.

Though private groups like First Street may produce their own climate projections, NOAA’s precipitation frequency estimates provide an authoritative national standard, said Chad Berginnis, executive director of the Association of State Floodplain Managers. City and state regulations have incorporated the federal data into building codes and development plans. Civil engineers are required to consult NOAA when designing features such as road culverts and stormwater drainage systems, which may be intended to last 50 years or more.

“Knowing the future condition helps make that investment more resilient,” Berginnis said.

He noted that most federal spending on disasters goes toward helping communities rebuild infrastructure that frequently wasn’t designed to withstand the kinds of weather that climate change can bring.

“Think about it as a taxpayer,” he said. “If we have this future information, we won’t have to continue to be in the cycle of damage, repair, replace, damage again.”

By Sarah Kaplan Sarah Kaplan is a climate reporter covering humanity’s response to a warming world. Follow on X@sarahkaplan48

As I say here, “This document was written for the American people, paid for by the taxpayers, and it contains vital information we need to keep ourselves safe in a changing climate, as the disasters that continue to mount demonstrate so tragically and clearly.”More by @borenbears.bsky.social here:

Katharine Hayhoe (@katharinehayhoe.com) 2025-07-16T02:09:13.996Z

Now that NOAA is no longer tracking billion-dollar weather disasters, rely on insurance broker Gallagher Re, who just released their list for the first half of 2025. So far, we are near the 10-year average. The CA wildfires ($65 billion) were the 8th-costliest weather disaster in world history.

Dr. Jeff Masters (@drjeffmasters.bsky.social) 2025-07-16T11:08:54.625Z

This is one thread you won’t want to miss. Schools are uniquely at risk from climate change – but they have so much potential to contribute to solutions!

Katharine Hayhoe (@katharinehayhoe.com) 2025-07-15T00:14:47.051Z

The discourse surrounding precipitation changes in a warming climate (both public discussion and even scientific one at times) is complicated by widespread conflation of changes in averages vs extremes (and also actual vs *potential* evaporation/evaporative demand). [Thread]

Daniel Swain (@weatherwest.bsky.social) 2025-07-16T19:35:46.000Z

I'm excited to share our Global Synthesis on Urban #Nature-based solutions. A meta-analysis of over 60 review papers combined with review from NBS experts in 7 global regions. See insights as well other articles in this Special Feature in PNAS, an output from NATURA www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/…

Timon McPhearson (@timonm.bsky.social) 2025-07-16T12:55:46.494Z

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *